Five Reactions from Supreme Court Ruling in Favor of Little Sisters of the Poor on Contraceptives Mandate

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled 7-2 that the Trump administration was allowed to broaden a religious exemption to the Health and Human Services’ contraceptive services coverage mandate.

Justice Clarence Thomas authored the majority opinion, being joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. Justice Elena Kagan filed a concurring opinion, being joined by Justice Stephen Breyer.

“The only question we face today is what the plain language of the statute authorizes. And the plain language of the statute clearly allows the Departments to create the preventive care standards as well as the religious and moral exemptions,” wrote Thomas.

“[W]e made it abundantly clear that, under RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act), the Departments must accept the sincerely held complicity-based objections of religious entities. That is, they could not ‘tell the plaintiffs that their beliefs are flawed’ because, in the Departments’ view, ‘the connection between what the objecting parties must do … and the end that they find to be morally wrong … is simply too attenuated.’”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg authored a dissenting opinion, being joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, claiming the majority opinion allowed “the religious beliefs of some to overwhelm the rights and interests of others who do not share those beliefs.”

“… this Court leaves women workers to fend for themselves, to seek contraceptive coverage from sources other than their employer’s insurer, and, absent another available source of funding, to pay for contraceptive services out of their own pockets,” wrote Ginsburg.

Here are five reactions to the highly watched legal battle over religious liberty and government-mandated coverage for contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs. They include pro-life and pro-choice activists, as well as those involved in the litigation.

Becket

The religious liberty law firm Becket, which represented the Little Sisters before the high court, celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of their clients.

Becket President Mark Rienzi said in a statement on Wednesday that he believed “America deserves better than petty governments harassing nuns.”

“The Court did the right thing by protecting the Little Sisters from an unnecessary mandate that would have gutted their ministry,” he stated.

“Governments don’t need nuns to distribute contraceptives. But they do need religious groups to care for the elderly, heal the sick and feed the hungry. These governments all have real work they ought to be doing rather than dividing people with old and unnecessary culture wars.”

Americans United for Separation of Church and State

Americans United for Separation of Church and State President and CEO Rachel Laser blasted the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of the religious exemption.

Laser argued that by allowing the exemption to take effect, the Supreme Court placed a “stamp of approval on the Trump administration’s exploitation of religious freedom at the expense of birth control coverage for workers, students and their families.”

“Religious freedom includes the right to believe as you see fit, not to impose your beliefs on or discriminate against others,” she said in a statement released Wednesday. 

“The government must not play favorites and allow particular religious beliefs that reject birth control to justify denying countless women and LGBTQ people access.”

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: Christian Post, Michael Gryboski