There is an unsettling insouciance fermenting in America: a casual acceptance of centralizing governmental powers. Don’t get me wrong. I applaud the wise and necessary steps that the President has taken in this unprecedented public health crisis. Like so many of my countrymen I delight in seeing the all-too-rare vision of, e.g., the liberal Democratic Governor of the great State of California working hand-in-hand with a Republican White House. Federalism at work for the good of all in such a dangerous hour is nothing short of inspiring.
Not since World War II has our nation galvanized public and private resources for a historic demonstration of wartime determination to defeat an enemy. These anxious weeks have tested our national will. In so many ways we have born the battle as one People, with heroes and heroines in lab coats and scrubs, with badges, in camouflage, at check-out counters, and sporting truckers’ caps, leading the way. Unless mistaken, I have sensed a strengthening of churches in this pandemic. Pastors leading mid-week Bible studies, and evening hymn-sings over Zoom remind many of an America we thought was long-gone. Palm Sunday liturgies from Anglican, Lutheran, and Presbyterian, converge with Easter services from Methodist, Baptist, and every imaginable expression of Independent congregations, turning Facebook, YouTube, and Vimeo into veritable Christian broadcasting networks. Indeed, there has been so much good, and so much unity, that we might have missed the lengthening shadow of an old enemy of the Church: Statism. Statism is a philosophy and innate predilection of governments — no, a deadly virus itself — that offers security for liberty. Statism is a “beast” of Revelation that persecutes the Church Dutch Reformed commentator, Dr. William Hendriksen (1900-1982) wrote, “The beast that comes up out of the sea is Satan’s persecution of Christians, embodied in world governments and directed against the bodies of believers” (Hendriksen, 1998. p. 26). The beastly powers of Statism are a constant danger to the Church and to the God-given rights of human beings. History demonstrates this fact.
Friedrich A. Hayek (1899–1992), Austrian-born Nobel-prize-winning economist, who became a British subject, after fleeing the threat of Hitler’s maniacal conquest, joined with the entire Free World to applaud and marvel at the indispensable leadership of Prime Minister Churchill in those years when Great Britain stood alone against what seemed to be an indestructible German National Socialism. However, it is said that Dr. Hayek counseled the courageous Churchill that while centralization of powers served Britain well in the great national emergency the same consolidation of powers in peacetime would cripple the country. He penned his most famous work in 1944: The Road to Serfdom to describe the tragic path to national poverty as a result of the unchecked State. Hayek’s premise is historically and undeniably proven: the abdication of one’s liberty to the State in exchange for a supposed security is a regrettable reoccurrence in the story of human history. The exchange is a sucker’s deal. The State and the elite who run it are rewarded at the expense of an imprisoned population.
Our system of English was shaped by centuries of the ebb and flow of the interminable encroachment of Statism — centralized power in the government — and the indomitable pursuit of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. The longing for self-determination might be suppressed for a sorrowful season, but like the mythical Phoenix, the human spirit invariably takes flight from the bondage of dictators, despots, and collectives. Though too late for the generations who endured the bondage, a new burst of freedom eventually appears like the hopeful, golden glow of a morning sun after a long, gray winter. As Churchill reminded us in his History of the English-speaking People’s (1900). King Alfred’s Law (911) was based on Scriptural principles of government, and guaranteed the individual his God-given rights. In 1066 the Norman regent, William the Conquerer, invades England. Alfred’s law is abandoned for the calculated promises of the Norman’s protection. The degradation of human rights would endure until the missteps of King John and landholders’ demands for limited government in the Magna Carta (1215). Again, the usurping of the People’s representatives in the House of Commons by Charles I led to the English Civil War. The great Scottish Presbyterian minister and professor of divinity, Samuel Rutherford, wrote Lex, Rex (“The Law is King”), and by his compelling arguments from the Bible, English Law’s long history of rule by the consent of the governed was upheld. So, then, these principles of liberty soon flowered in the United States Constitution.
Click here to read more.
SOURCE: Christian Post, Michael A. Milton