I will leave it to others to reflect on the political and strategic implications of the killing of the ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (see, for example, here and here). And enough has been said to ridicule the disastrous “austere scholar” headline of The Washington Post (see here and here and here). Allow me instead to offer some moral reflections on America putting this monstrous terrorist to death.
First, there really is such a thing as good and evil. ISIS is and was evil. Al-Baghdadi was evil, just as Hitler was evil.
Terrorism is evil. Murder and rape are evil. Selling human beings into sex slavery is evil. Merchandizing aborted baby parts is evil.
Conversely, it is good to confront evil and to judge evil. And it was good to take out al-Baghdadi.
To be sure, there is more than enough moral ambiguity in our society, and many “good” causes become compromised by ulterior motives and human corruption.
As for life on earth, none of us is perfectly good (outside of Jesus; see Luke 18:19), and even the most evil person has some good quality, having been created in God’s image.
Yet there is no denying that some people are downright wicked, and either in this world or the world to come, they will certainly pay for their sins.
Second, God has given authority to governments and rulers to punish evil with the sword. In the words of Paul, “For he is the servant of God for your good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain, for he is the servant of God, an avenger to execute wrath upon him who practices evil. So it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for the sake of conscience” (Rom. 13:4-5).
Yes, governments, by the will of God, “bear the sword,” but for good, not for evil. It is therefore a terrible abuse of God-given authority when a government or king or president or leader uses the sword to promote evil and to suppress good. What a serious offense.
Click here to read more.
SOURCE: Charisma News