Karl Vaters on the Death of the ‘Get More People in the Room’ Attitude in Church

Image: davide ragusa | Unsplash

There are very few pastors who would say that bigger churches are inherently better than smaller churches. But most pastors believe it would be better if their church got bigger.

Not only do most pastors want their churches to get bigger, they believe it’s worth an extraordinary expenditure of time, effort and money to make numerical increase happen.

Most of our congregation members don’t agree.

This disparity between pastoral desires and congregational expectations is a relatively new phenomenon. There are a lot of pastors who haven’t caught up with this reality.

Most of their church members don’t agree that getting more people in the room is necessarily better for their church. And it’s not because they’re not concerned about evangelism. Something else is going on here.

A Generational Shift Regarding Church Growth

Less than a generation ago, if a pastor promoted a building campaign, almost everyone in the church would step up. They’d get excited by it, give extra offerings for it, and see it as a positive sign of health for the church.

It was unquestioned – if your church was healthy, it would grow, and if it grew it would need bigger buildings.

It’s being questioned now.

Certainly there will always be people who love a crowd and who will follow the next big thing. And there will always be churches that appeal to them. There are also churches that attract large crowds for healthy, life-giving reasons.

But size is no longer considered the obvious sign of health that it used to be. At least not by the average church member. And certainly not by the spiritual seeker.

Bigger is no longer considered better, and things that get better are no longer expected to get bigger as a result.

Unquestioned maxims such as “all healthy things grow” are being questioned now.

So, if getting more people in the room is no longer considered to be either a healthy goal or an inevitable result of a healthy church, what’s replacing it?

I see four not-so-new, but very healthy trends, especially among seekers and younger generations:

1. Engagement

Recently, Carey Nieuwhof wrote a wonderful article entitled 5 Reasons Why Engagement Is the New Attendance.

His (and my) essential point is that newer generations are less concerned with sitting passively in a church service than they are with engaging in the life of the church. And churches that want to attract and retain them will provide them with opportunities to do so.

This is a positive move towards greater health and effectiveness that should be recognized, embraced and encouraged.

2. Influence

At the same time Carey was writing 5 Reasons Why Engagement Is the New Attendance, I was teaching a segment in conferences called Influence Is the New Attendance. At first I thought he and I might be dealing with the same subject under slightly different terms. But we weren’t. While our concerns are similar, even overlapping, there are important distinctions between the two.

The bigger the church is the more important it is to emphasize engagement, while the smaller the church is the more important it is to increase our influence.

In bigger churches, getting people to be less passive and more engaged is an important step. But in smaller churches, congregation members are typically quite engaged in the life of the church (sometimes too engaged!) but it’s not always translating into greater influence outside the church walls.

While a big church has a certain amount of influence due to their raw numbers, smaller churches need to work harder to leverage their smaller numbers for greater influence.

Click here to read more.
Source: Christianity Today