Review by Anna Broadway. Anna Broadway is the author of Sexless in the City: A Memoir of Reluctant Chastity (WaterBrook). She is currently researching a book on the global experience of singleness among Christians.
Over the years, Christians have produced and read far more books on how relationships and singleness should work than on how these things actually do pan out. Vicky Walker’s new book Relatable: Exploring God, Love, & Connection in the Age of Choice, based on a survey of more than 1,400 people, aims to change that.
Walker writes from a more-or-less Protestant British perspective, but American Christians will find much they recognize. Over the course of 12 chapters and several appendices, Relatable covers everything from the history of marriage to typical teachings on gender roles to, of course, sex. But she also gets into stickier matters like the role of technology and the church’s significant sex-ratio gap—the latter a topic that raises questions of dating outside the faith.
Throughout the book, she leavens this often-difficult discussion with a welcome dose of humor. It’s not quite Monty Python, but Walker brings an almost C. S.-Lewisian appreciation of the comedy of our romantic foibles.
Framing Sex and Relationships
Much of the book reports the results of Walker’s survey, which encompassed a sizeable but somewhat homogenous group. Women vastly outnumbered men (71 percent to 26 percent; some didn’t answer this question) and less than 2 percent identified as Catholic, apparently none as Orthodox. Of the 900 who specified their ethnicity, 90 percent identified as white. The last number may partly reflect British population demographics, as well as a tendency toward segregated worship that extends into other social networks.
For those interested in further reading, Valerie Y. Bernard-Allan’s 2016 PhD thesis, “It Is Not Good to Be Alone; Singleness and the Black Seventh-day Adventist Woman,” provides a good complement to Walker’s book. Though Bernard-Allan uses a different research methodology from Walker, both women make substantial use of respondent quotes to illustrate the themes observed. Given her data set and survey questions, Walker doesn’t unearth some of the challenges that emerge in Bernard-Allen’s research, but both women report similarly lofty views of marriage.
In Walker’s case, her format provides more latitude for commentary. Thus, Relatable also weaves in critique and recommendations. Though Walker never states her own views explicitly, the sections of advice reflect a particular concern with emotional health.
And no wonder. As she reports, “Half of the survey respondents (49.8%) agreed with the statement ‘Christian culture emphasises [sic] abstinence over teaching about healthy relationships.’” (As I’ve argued previously, that’s because the church tends to focus more on sexual boundaries than the ethos implied by Christians’ call to self-giving love.)
When it came to Christian teachings, however, I found Walker’s critique more uneven. For the most part, she reserves her criticism for Christians’ flawed reading of the Bible—and certainly, our spiritual forefathers sinned no less than we today. Thus, Walker notes some of Augustine’s more harmful influences on the church’s theology of sex and rightly challenges teachers who overlook Jesus’ and Paul’s singleness in their thoroughgoing praise of marriage.
Her modern lens proves less helpful, though, when Walker confronts the Bible itself. Summarizing Deuteronomy 22, for example, while in somewhat humorous vein, she seems to miss some of the original context. As Don C. Benjamin writes in The Social World of Deuteronomy, “Promiscuity was not simply a lack of sexual discretion, but a symptom of the risks which the father of a household was taking with its resources.”
Click here to read more.
Source: Christianity Today