The Nuns Fought the Law and They Won: A Victory for Religious Freedom

Eric Metaxas
Eric Metaxas

Lots of bad news out there lately. But not today. Today we’ll talk about a big win for religious freedom.

On May 15th, the Supreme Court handed a big victory to the Little Sisters of the Poor and other Christian organizations that refused to go along with the HHS contraceptive mandate.

Not that you would know this if all you had to go on was the reaction of the mainstream media. When they weren’t downplaying the impact of the court’s three-page ruling remanding the cases to the lower courts, they were all-but-ignoring the story.

For instance, at the time this commentary is being written, there is no—that would be zero, zip, nada—mention of the story at the Washington Post’s homepage. There’s room for a story about a remake of the “Rocky Horror Picture Show” that has some LGBT activists upset, and a story about a food truck owner who sacrificed his family’s pet poodle in the backyard barbecue, but nothing about a ruling about the first freedom, freedom of religion. Are you shocked?

To understand why the Supreme Court’s action is good news, a little background is in order. Under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the law that formed the basis of the Little Sisters’ legal challenge to the HHS Mandate, a federal law that “substantially burdens” religious freedom can only be upheld if it meets the following criteria: it furthers a “compelling governmental interest,” and it furthers that interest in the “least restrictive way” possible.

While various parties challenged whether providing free contraception and abortifacients really constitutes a “compelling governmental interest,” the real argument was whether the Obama administration had chosen the least-restrictive means.

The administration insisted that its “accommodation,” in which the Little Sisters and others had to hire an insurance company that would provide the objectionable coverage, and then soothe their consciences by signing a form, was the least-restrictive means possible.

But as the Becket Fund, which represented the Little Sisters, pointed out during oral arguments this past March, the government had to admit that it “did have other ways to deliver the services without using the Little Sister’s plan or forcing them to participate.”

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: Breakpoint
Eric Metaxas