Homosexual Marriage Debate Has Republican Candidates Walking On Egg Shells

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), a 2016 presidential candidate, has proposed a constitutional amendment that would allow states to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. (Mary Schwalm/AP)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), a 2016 presidential candidate, has proposed a constitutional amendment that would allow states to define marriage as only between a man and a woman. (Mary Schwalm/AP)

Republican presidential hopefuls are struggling with how to position themselves on same-sex marriage, an issue that is bedeviling a party hoping to avoid social controversies as the 2016 election approaches.

Rapidly changing public opinion has forced much of the field to re-calibrate their pitches. Early front-runners have sought balance between the GOP base and the broader electorate — saying that they have no problem with gay people but oppose a national right to gay marriage and favor strong legal protections for business owners who do not want to serve same-sex ceremonies.

It is a difficult task, with the perils on stark display last month in Indiana. Republican state lawmakers encountered criticism when they tried to strengthen religious-liberties laws in the face of legal same-sex marriage in that state. With support for same-sex marriage hovering around 60 percent nationally, opponents also risk being labeled bigots.

At the same time, some conservative strategists see an upside for candidates who boldly oppose same-sex marriage. In arguments scheduled for Tuesday, the Supreme Court will consider whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage or whether it should be left to the states. If the court establishes a national right as expected, it could energize Christian activists.

The tensions were evident this week when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) made headlines at a meet-and-greet hosted by prominent gay New York hoteliers in which he reportedly said he would still love one of his daughters if she came out as gay, and did not discuss his opposition to same-sex marriage.

Under fire from conservatives, he clarified in a news release that he strongly supported “traditional marriage.” On Thursday, he also introduced a pair of bills to amend the Constitution to allow states to define marriage as between a man and a woman, and to forbid courts from intervening.

Cruz’s comment about his daughter at the gathering, first reported by the New York Times, “doesn’t suddenly mean we now support same-sex marriage. They’re different,” Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler said. The distinction, however, could be lost on voters and donors who have begun to view support for same-sex marriage and gay rights as a litmus test for tolerance and modern sensibilities.

Other GOP candidates have tried to tread a similarly fine line. Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) has said he opposes same-sex marriage and thinks the decision to legalize such unions should be left to the states. Yet he has been courting the Log Cabin Republicans, a national organization of gay conservatives, and in media interviews has said he would attend a same-sex wedding.

Former Florida governor Jeb Bush, a strident social warrior in office, has since softened his stance, suggesting that Americans should respect “couples making lifetime commitments to each other.” His top political adviser, David Kochel, has advocated for same-sex marriage.

Speaking last week in New Hampshire, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said marriage is “defined as between a man and a woman” and that he would prefer to see states decide on the matter. He also said that, in spite of that position, he has been to a “reception” for a gay family member.

But even careful maneuvering can be perilous. Rebecca Rutter, a Republican voter who attended a Walker event Sunday in Derry, N.H., said in an interview that she worried the candidate was out of step with the times.

“These candidates keep saying ‘states should decide’ without getting into what this means for real people,” she said. “I worry that my party is on the wrong side of history.”

For Republicans, the moment illustrates growing strife within the party’s ranks over the future of the GOP, in both posture and policies. Veteran hands are protective of the party’s long-held positions on marriage and other social issues, while a younger generation of Republicans is eager to move beyond the battlegrounds of their parents.

Jesse Benton, 37, a political confidant of Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), said younger-than-40 Republicans especially are holding back from such fights.

“There is a growing sentiment among [Generation Y members] and millennials, even those who are committed followers of Jesus, that the issue of same-sex marriage should not be political,” he said.

Click here to continue reading.

SOURCE: The Washington Post – Sandhya Somashekhar, Robert Costa