John Daniel Davidson of ‘The Federalist’ says If Obama Wants To Help Democrats, He Should Disappear

Barack Obama is back. Last week, the former president gave a speech at the University of Chicago, his first public remarks since leaving the White House on January 20. Obama’s theme, no surprise, was his post-presidency: “I’m spending a lot of time thinking about: ‘What is the most important thing I can do for my next job?’” 

Here’s an idea for Obama: disappear from public life for a decade.

With few exceptions, former presidents generally avoid the spotlight. Apart from a few interviews George W. Bush gave earlier this year to promote his book of portraits honoring military veterans, Americans didn’t hear much from him once he left office. Bill Clinton didn’t exactly retire after his stint in the White House, but he at least confined himself mostly to giving overpaid speeches to global elites and shilling for his wife.

Obama, by contrast, was only out of office 11 days before releasing a statement critical of President Trump’s executive order on immigration. To some extent, Obama’s frustration is understandable: his eight years in office ended with a contentious election that saw voters reject his chosen successor, Hillary Clinton, and put a loudmouth populist in the White House.

Nevertheless, at this point it would do the country good not to hear from Obama for a while. It also might be the only thing that can save the Democratic Party.

Obama Presided Over the Decimation of His Party

Right now, Democrats are at risk of becoming uncompetitive for a generation or more. But their trouble didn’t start with Clinton’s loss to Trump, it started during Obama’s tenure in office. Since 2009, Democrats have steadily lost ground in statehouses and governors’ mansions across the country. Since 2009, Republicans have captured 27 state legislatures and today control 67 of 98 partisan legislative chambers across the country, as well as 33 governorships. All told, the GOP controls 1,000 more legislative seats than they did when Obama took office.

When Clinton lost in November, it seemed like Obama’s most lasting legacy would be the decimation of his own party. It still looks that way today, in part because the Democrats are still in disarray.

The recent “unity tour” from Democratic National Chairman Tom Perez and Sen. Bernie Sanders highlighted just how fractured the Democrats are right now. During the tour, Sanders drew sharp criticism from Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America for supporting a pro-life Democrat running for mayor of Omaha, Nebraska. Sanders was defiant, while Perez scrambled to mollify pro-abortion Democrats. The overwhelming message, though, was that pro-life Democrats are no longer welcome in the party.

The Omaha fracas underscored just how far left the Democratic Party’s base has shifted since 2008. Recall that back then, candidates Obama and Clinton both opposed gay marriage. Today, it would be impossible for any national Democratic candidate to espouse such a view, just as it would impossible to espouse anything but unqualified endorsement of progressive ideas about transgenderism—an issue that was a political non-issue for most of Obama’s time in office.

The leftward lurch isn’t just on social issues. It’s hard to imagine any Democratic candidate for president in 2020 who won’t heartily endorse single-payer health care, socialized college tuition, a $15 minimum wage (at least), and amnesty for illegal immigrants. Such policies have become imperatives for the progressive activists now in charge of the party.

Click here to read more

Source: The Federalist | John Daniel Davidson