Has the Rise of the Internet Increased Plagiarism Among Pastors In the Pulpit?
Thou shalt not steal another pastorâ€™s sermon?
Recent cases of high-profile pastors who have been accused of lifting othersâ€™ material are raising questions about whether pulpit plagiarism is on the rise â€” and whether it has become a more forgivable sin.
Seattle megachurch pastor Mark Driscoll was accused last year of plagiarism in material he wrote with Tyndale House Publishers and InterVarsity Press. â€śMistakes were made that I am grieved by and apologize for,â€ť Driscoll said in a statement. Most recently, popular Oklahoma City-based megachurch pastor Craig Groeschel has been accused of plagiarizing the work of writer and comedian Danny Murphy.
Groeschel is the pastor of Lifechurch.tv, a tech-savvy megachurch founded in 1996 that has quickly grown to one of the nationâ€™s largest churches, with 80 weekly â€śworship experiencesâ€ť across 19 campuses in five states.
On his blog, Murphy suggested Groeschel used material that Murphy wrote in the now-defunct magazine The Door in 2000. The material was later used by Groeschel in a sermon and in a book now titled â€śLove, Sex, and Happily Ever After,â€ť printed by Multnomah Books. Murphyâ€™s name never appeared with it.
Itâ€™s not the first time Murphy has found his work in the hands of others; he was â€śminding my own business in the back row of a churchâ€ť when he heard the preacher use the same material from the article in The Door. When questioned, the pastor said he had found it in the best-selling book â€śNot a Fan,â€ť by Kyle Idleman. Murphy flagged the issue for the publisher, Zondervan, and the attribution was fixed in the next printing of the book, he said.
According to Murphy, Multnomah has also inserted a footnote with attribution in Groeschelâ€™s text, although Groeschel never admitted to lacking earlier attribution, maintaining the content was his.
â€śI feel strongly about giving credit and have done so over and over again in sermons and books,â€ť Groeschel said in a statement. â€śWe first used this idea in a sermon illustration video, which I sincerely thought was an original concept developed before the authorâ€™s article. To be above reproach, I asked my publisher to give this author credit, which is already reflected in the most recent reprinting of the book where this illustration is used.â€ť
As more instances of plagiarism are being alleged, itâ€™s unclear whether plagiarism is more common, or if itâ€™s being reported more often. Plagiarism has been a long-standing issue among pastors, who are expected to churn out fresh content each week for sermons while in some cases also penning best-selling books.
â€śIn this day of celebrity publishing, a lot of the quality control is eroding,â€ť said David Gushee, Christian ethicist at Mercer University.
Sermons can be ephemeral things, in one ear of many parishioners and out the other. If the sermon is not written down or posted online, an unattributed quote can be easy to miss. Books, however, are an easier place to spot unsourced material.
There has been a long-standing debate among preachers over whether they can use sermon illustrations that they didnâ€™t personally experience, Gushee said. â€śThere are ways to borrow illustrations without being deceptive,â€ť he said.
The ease of the Internet could be a double-edged sword for some pastors looking for material. With sermons and books so easily searchable online, watchdogs have better means of cataloging, searching and reporting offenses. And itâ€™s much easier to learn about and report offenses of plagiarism than ever before.
Click here to read more.
SOURCE: Religion News Service
Sarah Pulliam Bailey